Im in a Custody Battle With a Bipolar Mother Who Has Sleepovers With Mentally Ill Public Drug Users. Unfit?
Question by rlblondes75: Im in a custody battle with a bipolar mother who has sleepovers with mentally ill public drug users. Unfit?
Keep in mind my son is present for all of this…In addition to her own illness, her best friend who I found has babysat my son and stays over some nights posted a picture on Facebook of her smoking pot (Remember Michael Phelps?) There are also several postings about her drug use including “hard narcotics” and references to a BDSM relationship with my ex. In the past she has stolen my exes precription pills and been found almost bled to death in a bathtub. I also found out my ex has a new “friend”, a schizophrenic on disability (I know him as an aquaintance) who I have video of his truck in her driveway staying overnight (my son told me he was “staying with them a little while”) Another friend coming over has a police record such as “ELUDING POLICE” She filed a Protective Order against me in 2007 without any proof of abuse based on my own Bipolar disorder (She wasn’t admitting her own at the time) when I wouldn’t stay with her so she could live her alternative lifestyle. I am stable and in a healthy relationship with a woman who has known me ten years and sincerely believes I am not capable of violent acts (she has no mental illness or record). We are looking to get a house together and she supports my decision to pursue full custody of my son as she knows I’m not the abuser I am alleged to be in addition to how my son reacts to me (he hates going home on Sundays). What are my options? Can my attorney have these people banned from coming around at the very least legally? If it is not those degenerates it will be someone else (She has filed three Protective Orders, the first was when I caught her trying to have a threesome while locking my son in his bedroom.a week after we separated. I naturally protested and she filed the order. She dropped it six days later. The second time I had tried moving on with my life with another woman who had it more together. She dropped that order as soon as she found out I broke things off. The third time was when I told her my son was going with me, he was not safe with her.) I fought for eight months just to get two days a month supervised by my parents. I got that extended to full supervised weekends. The protective order ends in November and I have abided by it entirely (I sent a family member to get the video evidence). I have saved every document that clearly shows a pattern of conflicting evidence presented by her (statements indicating I have never hit, cursed, or harmed her physically) as well as a police report from the last night that indicates no abuse as she later stated. The courts wont allow past issues to be brought up but the first things metioned are recent (Im hoping if she brings up the POs I will have the right to at that point expose her perjury and inconsistency in obtaining them). I have a competent attorney working for me, and unfortunately the case is so complicated it costs me a hundred dollars everytime I just give him a written summary of what she is doing or engaging in. I can’t find anything online about shady aquaintences in Virginia related to proving a mother unfit (Her bipolar causes poor judgement…i.e. bipolar drug using friends and schizos around my son) She has actually used my bipolar (before she admitted to her own) as a reason to keep me away, how are these degenerates any better? Id appreciate some good advice.
Best answer:
Answer by ~*D!abl!TO g~* aka azulcrema
Idk!!!! Ask this in the goverment section if not get yourself a really good lawyer it might cost you some money but he can probaly get you custody of your son
Add your own answer in the comments!
ATF ‘Fast and Furious’ Gun Regulations – New documents show that the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) wanted to use their “Fast and Furious” program (selling guns to Mexican drug cartels with the idea of tracking them) to argue for more regulations on guns. Ana Kasparian and Cenk Uygur discuss on The Young Turks. www.cbsnews.com Cenk and Ana on the new Virginia Tech shootings: www.youtube.com Subscribe to The Young Turks: bit.ly The Largest Online New Show in the World. Google+: www.gplus.to Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com
Virginia Beach Woman Convicted Of Animal Cruelty
Filed under: Virginia Drug Use
A Virginia Beach woman is banned from owning or possessing animals in the city following her … But, is it the best use of your tax dollars? … RICHMOND, VA—A local charity's proposal to open a home for recovering drug addicts has one …
Read more on WRIC
After Navy comes drugs, streets, VA help
Filed under: Virginia Drug Use
"I didn't even have to wait, and I received shelter that night from the VA." Jones said those battles against addiction contributed to his eventual homelessness.
Read more on Jackson Clarion Ledger
Ag Secretary To Campaign For Obama In Virginia
Filed under: Virginia Drug Use
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack is headed to Virginia to campaign in Blacksburg with a one-term … But, is it the best use of your tax dollars? … RICHMOND, VA—A local charity's proposal to open a home for recovering drug addicts has one …
Read more on WRIC
Tags: ana kasparian, virginia drug, virginia drug use
fuck you? gun grabbers.
Don’t forget the? sixth amendment.
Well we just need better background checks. Not to limit the number of guns or gun control because that stuff has been proven to cause more death. For example California my home state, just banned open carry and a city called Stockton has set a new record in murders. California has the most gun control, and has more death then any other state. My point is look at Switzerland, every house there has a machine? gun they have never been invaded, and also has a very low crime rate.
You obviously didn’t pay any sort of attention the to latter half of my comment; there is a loophole to those background checks as I mentioned previously. Prices don’t matter to? gun merchants
What do you think is a assault rifle because an AR15 is not and a 7.62 rifle is not, a full auto machine gun is, and you have to register it and, there is a 200 tax on them along with very high price tag. Along with a background check and that’s for any? gun.
Gun controll? is bullshit
Actually we sold them to the Mexican armies. Cartel members joined the army and stole the guns when they left their posts and/or training. But we knew this would happen. It’s not like we said here you go cartel? have fun.
@nhponau yeah i made sure i got a federal firearms license as soon as i heard they were available sir they will likely not be available much longer if the laws change. so its either get? one now and its still valid even if the laws change or risk missing out all together here is the best place online to get them => bit.ly/JfczSy?=hsztj
sounds? like obama was trying to pull a repeat of the reichstag fire.
Machine guns aren’t indiscriminate, they’re capable of engaging single man-size targets with ease, your argument holds NO water.
Just because something has no need in society doesn’t mean it SHOULD be excluded. That’s the oldest beat-to-shit argument I’ve ever heard. You don’t NEED a swimming pool, 3,500 people every year drown in the US, guess it’s time to ban them.
But wait, what prevents drowning? Teaching people how? to swim (water safety).
Teach gun safety, or live with the consequences.
So you people here wish to trample a mans right, then you’re no better than the crooks in the whites house you bleeding heart liberals. People? who wan’t to ban guns have never picked one up and shot one, they have never even walked into a pawn shop.
How the fuck did they intend to track the guns once the ended up in the hands? of organized criminals?
Why do? you want more gun control for law abiding citizens? There are no gun control laws for the drug cartels but you didn’t think about about that did you?
If you support gun control, you are a? fucking moron.
@you
A car isn’t designed to snuff out life.
I said machine guns, so?? I brought the conversation to weapons that kill indiscriminately because of your statement: Do you need a car that goes over 80 mph? Do you need to have a? tv bigger than 26″? etc. The answer is no but my money my property I should be able to by whatever I want.
So I brought it to bio-weapons, artillery rounds, explosives. Your logic works for machine guns? all the way to a hydrogen bomb. No line, your money – your property.
A car isn’t designed to snuff out life.
I said machine guns,? so? I brought the conversation to weapons that kill indiscriminately because of your statement: Do you need a car that goes over 80 mph? Do you need to have a? tv bigger than 26″? etc. The answer is no but my money my property I should be able to by whatever I want.
So I brought it to bio-weapons, artillery rounds, explosives. Your logic works for machine guns all the way to a hydrogen bomb. No line, your money – your property.
You originally said machine guns. There is a HUGE difference between a machine gun and? biological weapons. Can you give me a real reason to own a car that goes over 80mph?
By your logic… if you can afford weapons that kill indiscriminately like artillery shells, biological weapons, that you should be allowed to own it. You know that’s bullshit logic.
I can afford a military grade 203 grenade launcher, I should be allowed? to own it!
I asked for a real reason, not half-assed thoughts.
There are many thing you “don’t need”. Do you need a car that goes over 80 mph? Do you need to have a tv bigger than 26″? etc. The? answer is no but my money my property I should be able to by whatever I want.
People may want various fully autos, but they don’t need them. I invite all to give me a reason outside the paranoid dribble about the New World Order and Obama using the? US military to kill you. Really.
A real reason, please? Why would one need a full auto?
Montana has some great gunlaws, and few states has been more outspoken against? the centralization of power as they have, you need a special permit for full auto there, im fine with that, semi autos are fine. Firearms is just a tool to guard your other freedoms and a last option, but an important one. I support Ron Paul, all for drug legalization, antisurveillance, stop wars etc, we need more freedom and leave people alone, this emerging police state must be stopped.
Okay, so as we come to firearms then we look at the small arms like handguns, long guns, and automatic weapons. Do all these classify as weapons that can be used for defense? Each category is wide. Autos: Machine guns, submachine guns, automatic rifles. Force magnifier here? is obvious but where is the line here? Or are all firearms suitable in your belief?
A single machine gun can easily kill crowds of people, but no sensible regulation? Paranoia is also a slippery slope.
Fuck the ATF! Fuck? gun regulations!
Its? a stupid “dilemma”. Nuclear weapons, mines, anthrax etc kills blindly and is not a “weapon” you use for defence, but firearms are more than powerful enough to equal out the power balance between government and people.